Distinctive doping- and temperature-dependent metallic conductivity in moderately doped Y-based cuprate superconductors
DOI (Low Temperature Physics):
https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0046904Ключові слова:
Y-based high-Tc cuprate superconductors, large polarons and bosonic Cooper pairs, pseudogap and strange-metal state, in-plane conductivity and resistivity, doping and temperature dependenceАнотація
The enigmatic pseudogap state and anomalous charge-transport properties of doped high-Tc cuprate super conductors are two hallmark features that distinguish these exotic materials from conventional metals. Here, we investigate the systematic evolution of the emergent pseudogap and the distinctive metallic conductivity in Y-based cuprate superconductors as a function of doping x and temperature T. We argue that the charge carriers in moderately doped cuprates, from underdoped to overdoped regimes, are large polarons and preformed pola ronic Cooper pairs, emerging as composite bosons at a temperature T* higher than the superconducting transition temperature Tc and condensing into a Bose superfluid at Tc, thereby driving high-Tc superconductivity that is fairly well described by the Dzhumanov’s theory of Bose-liquid superfluidity. We consider the distinctive in plane metallic conductivity in these materials as the conductivity of three different types of charge carriers (large polarons, bosonic Cooper pairs and excited polaronic components of these pairs) scattering off lattice vibrations in thin CuO2 layers of finite thickness. We use the appropriate Boltzmann transport equations and the BCS-like pseudogap equation (applicable below T*) to calculate the conductivity of polaronic carriers above T* and that of the two other above-mentioned types of charge carriers below T* in high-Tc cuprates within the relaxation-time approximation. By comparing the calculated doping- and temperature-dependent in-plane resistivity ρab(x, T) with experimental data for various Y-based cuprate superconductors, we find that the T-linear dependence of ρab(x, T) above T* originates from polaron-phonon scattering. In contrast, the pronounced nonlinear temperature depend ence of the in-plane resistivity and its various downward and upward deviations from T-linear behavior below T* at different doping levels x arise from the competition between the dominant conductivity of bosonic Cooper pairs and the pseudogap-suppressed conductivity of the excited polaronic components of these pairs. Our results will shed new light on the microscopic origins of the enigmatic pseudogap state and strange-metal states in un conventional high-Tc cuprate superconductors.
Посилання
1. S. Dzhumanov and P. K. Khabibullaev, Pramana J. Phys. 45, 385 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02875175
2. V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Nature 374, 434 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/374434a0
3. Google ScholarCrossref
4. P. W. Anderson, The Theory of Superconductivity in the High-Tc Cuprates (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997).
5. B. P. Stojkovic and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. B 55, 8576 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.8576
6. H. Takagi and N. E. Hussey, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” 136, 227 (1998).
7. T. Timusk and B. Statt, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 61 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/62/1/002
8. J. L. Tallon and J. W. Loram, Physica C 349, 53 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4534(00)01524-0
9. A. S. Alexandrov, Theory of Superconductivity: From Weak to Strong Coupling (IoP Publishing, Bristol, 2003).
10. P. Phillips, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1719 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1719
11. T. M. Rice, K.-Y. Yang, and F. C. Zhang, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 016502 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/1/016502
12. A. L. Solovjov, E. V. Petrenko, L. V. Omelchenko, R. V. Vovk, I. L. Goulatis, and A. Chroneos, Sci. Rep. 9, 9274 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45286-w
13. M. Qin, R. Zhang, C. Miao, Z. Wei, Y. Shi, Y. Yao, H. Wang, Y. Li, K. Jin, and X. Xiang, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023194 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023194
14. Z.-J. Lang, A. Hegg, Y. Yildirim, S. Jiang, L. Zou, X. Yue, T. Zeng, J. Hou, and W. Ku, Physica C 634, 1354723 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2025.1354723
15. M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1039
16. H. Raffy, V. Toma, C. Murrills, and Z.-Z. Li, Physica C 460 462, 851 (2007).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2007.04.209
17. H. Hashimoto, K. Tanaka, T. Yoshida, A. Fujimori, M. Okusawa, S. Wakimoto, K. Yamada, T. Kakeshita, H. Eisaki, and S. Uchida, Physica C 460–462, 884 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2007.03.181
18. S. Dzhumanov, Solid State Commun. 115, 155 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1098(00)00052-1
19. S. Dzhumanov and O. K. Ganiev, and Sh. S. Djumanov, Physica B 427, 22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2013.06.027
20. A. L. Solovjov and V. M. Dmitriev, Low Temp. Phys. 32, 99 (2006) [Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 32, 139 (2006)]. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2171509
21. R. V. Vovk, N. R. Vovk, O. V. Shekhovtsov, I. L. Goulatis, and A. Chroneos, Superconduc. Sci. Technol. 26, 085017 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/26/8/085017
22. T. Matsuzaki, M. Ido, N. Momono, R. M. Dipasupil, T. Nagata, A. Sakai, and M. Oda, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 62, 29 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(00)00096-2
23. Google ScholarCrossref
24. M. Eschring, Adv. Phys. 55, 47 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730600645636
25. I. M. Vishik, M. Hashimoto, and R.-H. He, W.-Sh. Lee, F. Schmitt, D. Lu, R. G. Moore, C. Zhang, W. Meevasana, T. Sasagawa, S. Uchida, K. Fujita, S. Ishida, M. Ishikado, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, Z. Hussain, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.-X. Shen, PNAS 109, 18332 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209471109
26. Y. Noat, A. Mauger, M. Nohara, H. Eisaki, S. Ishida, and W. Sacks, Solid State Commun. 348–349, 114689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2022.114689
27. Y. Ando, S. Komiya, K. Segawa, S. Ono, and Y. Kurita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 267001 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.267001
28. P. W. Phillips, N. E. Hussey, and P. Abbamonte, Science 377, eabh4273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh4273
29. S. Dzhumanov, Bose Liquid Theory for Unconventional Superconductors and Superfluids (Cambrige Scholars Publishing, Cambrige, 2024).
30. F. Rullier-Albenque and H. Alloul, arXiv:1205.1404v1 (2012).
31. S. Beck and A. Ramires, arXiv:2511.02508 (2025).
32. K. Gorny, O. M. Vyaselev, J. A. Martindale, V. A. Nandor, C. H. Pennington, P. C. Hammel, W. L. Hults, J. L. Smith, P. L. Kuhns, A. P. Reyes, and W. G. Moulton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 177 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.177
33. V. B. Geshkenbein, L. B. Ioffe, and A. I. Larkin, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3173 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.3173
34. P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17
35. A. Lanzara, P. V. Bogdanov, X. J. Zhou, S. A. Kellar, D. L. Feng, E. D. Lu, T. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, A. Fujimori, K. Kishio, J.-I. Shimoyama, T. Noda, S. Uchida, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Nature 412, 510 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35087518
36. V. Z. Kresin and S. A. Wolf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 481 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.481
37. J. T. Devreese and A. S. Alexandrov, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 066501 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/72/6/066501
38. B. Ya. Yavidov, S. M. Otajonov, D. E. Uskenbaev, O. K. Ganiev, and A. S. Jalekeshov, J. Supercond. Novel Magnet. 38, 133 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-025-06978-9
39. S. Sugai, Physica C 185–189, 76 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(91)91953-2
40. X. X. Bi and P. C. Eklund, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2625 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2625
41. A. V. Puchkov, D. N. Basov, and T. Timusk, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 8, 10049 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/8/48/023
42. M. A. Kastner, R. J. Birgeneau, G. Shirane, and Y. Endoh, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 897 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.897
43. S. Miyaki, K. Makoshi, and H. Koizumi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 034702 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.77.034702
44. S. Dzhumanov, Physica A 517, 197 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.11.006
45. A. Ino, C. Kim, M. Nakamura, T. Yoshida, T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori, Z.-X. Shen, T. Kakeshita, H. Eisaki, and S. Uchida, Phys. Rev. B 65, 094504 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.094504
46. S. Dzhumanov, Pramana-J. Phys. 97, 205 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-023-02654-6
47. S. Dzhumanov, B. Ya. Yavidov, and Sh. S. Djumanov, Uzb. J. Phys. 18, 100 (2016).
48. A. A. Abrikosov, Fundamentals of the Theory of Metals (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988).
49. S. Dzhumanov, P. J. Baimatov, O. K. Ganiev, Z. S. Khudayberdiev, and B. V. Turimov, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 73, 484 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2011.11.029
50. P. B. Allen, Z. Fisk, and A. Migliory, Physical Properties of High Temperature Superconductors, edited by I, D. M. Ginsberg (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), Chap. 5.
51. S. Dzhumanov and Z. S. Khudayberdiev, and Sh. S. Djumanov, Physica B 465, 29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2015.02.011
52. Ch. Thomsen and M. Cardona, Physical Properties of High Temperature Superconductors, edited by I, D. M. Ginsberg (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), Chap. 8.
53. R. E. Cohen, W. E. Pickett, and H. Krakauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 831 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.831
54. A. Carrington, D. J. C. Walker, A. P. Mackenzie, and J. R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13051 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.13051
55. E. Wahlberg, R. Arpaia, G. Seibold, M. Rossi, R. Fumagalli, E. Trabaldo, N. B. Brookes, L. Braicovich, S. Caprara, U. Gran, G. Ghiringhelli, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Science 373, 1506 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc8372
56. C. F. S. Pinheiro and E. V. L. de Mello, Physica A 391, 1532 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.08.033